Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Entradas, M. (2015). Science and the public: the public understanding of science and its measurements. Portuguese Journal of Social Science. 14 (1), 71-85
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
M. C. Entradas,  "Science and the public: the public understanding of science and its measurements", in Portuguese Journal of Social Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 71-85, 2015
Exportar BibTeX
@article{entradas2015_1714687376050,
	author = "Entradas, M.",
	title = "Science and the public: the public understanding of science and its measurements",
	journal = "Portuguese Journal of Social Science",
	year = "2015",
	volume = "14",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1386/pjss.14.1.71_1",
	pages = "71-85",
	url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/pjss/2015/00000014/00000001/art00006"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Science and the public: the public understanding of science and its measurements
T2  - Portuguese Journal of Social Science
VL  - 14
IS  - 1
AU  - Entradas, M.
PY  - 2015
SP  - 71-85
SN  - 1476-413X
DO  - 10.1386/pjss.14.1.71_1
UR  - https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/pjss/2015/00000014/00000001/art00006
AB  - This is the first of a two-part historical review on the relationship between science and its publics in the second half of the twentieth century. The two-part literature review covers major trends in the evolution of this relationship from ‘public understanding of science’ (PUS) in which science was separated from laypeople, through the transition to ‘public participation’ when PUS became a matter for science policy. This first part of the literature describes the arguments that called for an increase in the public’s understanding of science, its measurement, and the academic debate in favour of and against PUS measures. In particular, we refer to the evolution of survey design, and how criticisms of measures of PUS gave rise to the ‘contextual’ perspective in the PUS being favoured over a ‘deficit’ one.
ER  -