Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA)
Arriaga, P., Alexandre, J., Postolache, O., Fonseca, M. J., Langlois, T. & Chambel, T.  (2020). Why do we watch? The role of emotion gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatchability and movie recommendation. Behavioral Sciences . 10 (8), 1-11
Export Reference (IEEE)
P. P. Ferreira et al.,  "Why do we watch? The role of emotion gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatchability and movie recommendation", in Behavioral Sciences , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-11, 2020
Export BibTeX
@article{ferreira2020_1716243120539,
	author = "Arriaga, P. and Alexandre, J. and Postolache, O. and Fonseca, M. J. and Langlois, T. and Chambel, T. ",
	title = "Why do we watch? The role of emotion gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatchability and movie recommendation",
	journal = "Behavioral Sciences ",
	year = "2020",
	volume = "10",
	number = "8",
	doi = "10.3390/bs10010008",
	pages = "1-11",
	url = "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/behavsci"
}
Export RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why do we watch? The role of emotion gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatchability and movie recommendation
T2  - Behavioral Sciences 
VL  - 10
IS  - 8
AU  - Arriaga, P.
AU  - Alexandre, J.
AU  - Postolache, O.
AU  - Fonseca, M. J.
AU  - Langlois, T.
AU  - Chambel, T. 
PY  - 2020
SP  - 1-11
SN  - 2076-328X
DO  - 10.3390/bs10010008
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/journal/behavsci
AB  - Background: The present study’s main aim was to determine the predictors of movie rewatchability and recommendations. Methods: Using a sample of 318 participants, we first tested the structure of a gratification scale from watching a movie. Then, we examined the role of age, need for cognition, need for affect, extraversion, and emotional gratifications, in predicting individuals’ interest in rewatching the movie and in making recommendations. Results: As in the original proposal of the emotional gratification scale, the following dimensions were identified: fun, thrill, empathic sadness, release of emotions, social sharing, contemplative experiences, and character engagement, with acceptable model fit and reliability, convergent and divergent validity. Social sharing, contemplate experiences, need for affect and age were significant predictors of movie recommendation; whereas social sharing, thrill, extraversion, and age contributed most to explaining rewatching interest. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering distinct gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatching and movie recommendation.
ER  -