Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Vidal, N. F. (2018). International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 61 (1), 1-19
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
N. C. Vidal,  "International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique", in Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2018
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{vidal2018_1716153924010,
	author = "Vidal, N. F.",
	title = "International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique",
	journal = "Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional",
	year = "2018",
	volume = "61",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1590/0034-7329201800115",
	pages = "1-19",
	url = "http://www.scielo.br/rbpi"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique
T2  - Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
VL  - 61
IS  - 1
AU  - Vidal, N. F.
PY  - 2018
SP  - 1-19
SN  - 0034-7329
DO  - 10.1590/0034-7329201800115
UR  - http://www.scielo.br/rbpi
AB  - Development thinking has been progressively dominated by neo-institutionalism, influencing major donors in Africa, and recently included in the UN 2030 Agenda for development. This paper discusses some unintended impacts of such strategies in neo-patrimonial regimes such as Angola and Mozambique, whereby neo-institutionalism favoured donors' apolitical “partnership” with resilient neo-patrimonial structures, facilitating its recycling, sophistication, and modernization, taking advantage of financial globalization to its own ends and improving its democratic image through elections, but leaving untouched the principles of neo-patrimonial political management for a minority to hold on to power since independence. Theoretically, this approach contrasts with varieties of democracy and varieties of capitalism perspectives.
ER  -