Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA)
Carvalho, E. & Bicho, M. (2023). Social entrepreneur perceived success by integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion. 20 (4), 406-432
Export Reference (IEEE)
Ema and M. L. Bicho,  "Social entrepreneur perceived success by integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA", in Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 406-432, 2023
Export BibTeX
@article{ema2023_1716220433697,
	author = "Carvalho, E. and Bicho, M.",
	title = "Social entrepreneur perceived success by integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA",
	journal = "Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion",
	year = "2023",
	volume = "20",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.51327/KJOF5806",
	pages = "406-432",
	url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jmsr/rmsr20/2023/00000020/00000004/art00004"
}
Export RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Social entrepreneur perceived success by integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA
T2  - Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion
VL  - 20
IS  - 4
AU  - Carvalho, E.
AU  - Bicho, M.
PY  - 2023
SP  - 406-432
SN  - 1476-6086
DO  - 10.51327/KJOF5806
UR  - https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jmsr/rmsr20/2023/00000020/00000004/art00004
AB  - The dual nature of social enterprises (social and financial goals) brings crucial challenges regarding the tensions to which objectives address, and therefore success is harder to assess and attain. This study aims to respond to this gap of knowledge by investigating social enterprises perceived path to success. It gives voice to social entrepreneur’s notion of success and applies the combination of Cognitive Mapping and MACBETH, techniques that help to capture success criteria’s complexity. The outcome of this study is a framework that allows to understand the way social entrepreneurs perceive success for their social enterprises. The findings reveal five indicators, in which the most important is Financial  Sustainability, followed by Social Impact, whereas Business Model is considered the least important factor.
ER  -