Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Lopes, D., Vala, J. & Oberlé, D. (2017).  Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisions. Social Science Information. 56 (3), 434-453
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
D. M. Lopes et al.,  " Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisions", in Social Science Information, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 434-453, 2017
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{lopes2017_1713893337579,
	author = "Lopes, D. and Vala, J. and Oberlé, D.",
	title = " Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisions",
	journal = "Social Science Information",
	year = "2017",
	volume = "56",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1177/0539018417714682",
	pages = "434-453",
	url = "http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0539018417714682"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  -  Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: the case of validity of groups’ decisions
T2  - Social Science Information
VL  - 56
IS  - 3
AU  - Lopes, D.
AU  - Vala, J.
AU  - Oberlé, D.
PY  - 2017
SP  - 434-453
SN  - 0539-0184
DO  - 10.1177/0539018417714682
UR  - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0539018417714682
AB  - In this article, we analyse the moderating effect of the activation of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of heterogeneity and consensus information in the attribution of validity to group decisions. In two experimental studies, we present evidence showing that the participants, when primed with an interdependent view of the self, make no distinction between homogeneous or heterogeneous information regarding group composition while attributing validity to group decisions. Indeed, they base their validity attribution mainly on consensus information. In contrast, when primed with an independent view of the self, they make use of variability information as they attribute a greater validity to a more heterogeneous and consensual group and a lower validity to a group depicted as homogeneous and consensual. Results are discussed in light of the differential utility of consensus and heterogeneity information, as well as participants’ self-knowledge within the processes of validation of group decisions.
ER  -