Book chapter
Orchestrating (bio-)diversity: the secretariat of the convention of biological diversity as an attention-seeking bureaucracy
Helge Jörgens (Jörgens, H.); Nina Kolleck (Kolleck, N.); Barbara Saerbeck (Saerbeck, B.); Mareike Well (Well, M.);
Book Title
International bureaucracy: challenges and lessons for public administration research
Year (definitive publication)
2017
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 38

(Last checked: 2025-12-13 08:34)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Conceptualizing international public administrations (IPAs) as attention-seeking bureaucracies which aim to actively feed their policy-relevant information into multilateral decision-making process, the chapter proposes two pathways through which international treaty secretariats may seek to influence international negotiations: (a) secretariats may attempt to supply policy-relevant information to negotiators from the inside via their close cooperation with the chairs of multilateral negotiations; (b) they may attempt to build support for their preferred policy outputs by engaging with and communicatively connecting actors within the broader transnational policy network in order to exert pressure on negotiators from the outside. Taking the secretariat of the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) as an example, these potential pathways of secretariat influence are illustrated and explored empirically. The findings contribute to a growing body of literature that studies the role of national and IPAs as agenda-setters, policy entrepreneurs, or policy brokers at the interface of public policy analysis and PA.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Policy Process,Knowledge Broker,Multilateral Negotiation,Heuristic Framework,Policy Broker