Export Publication
The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.
Ashofteh, A. & Bravo, J. (2020). A study on the quality of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) official datasets. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 36 (2), 291-301
A. Ashofteh and J. M. Bravo, "A study on the quality of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) official datasets", in Statistical Journal of the IAOS, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 291-301, 2020
@article{ashofteh2020_1766474202802,
author = "Ashofteh, A. and Bravo, J.",
title = "A study on the quality of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) official datasets",
journal = "Statistical Journal of the IAOS",
year = "2020",
volume = "36",
number = "2",
doi = "10.3233/SJI-200674",
pages = "291-301",
url = "https://content.iospress.com/journals/statistical-journal-of-the-iaos/Pre-press/Pre-press"
}
TY - JOUR TI - A study on the quality of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) official datasets T2 - Statistical Journal of the IAOS VL - 36 IS - 2 AU - Ashofteh, A. AU - Bravo, J. PY - 2020 SP - 291-301 SN - 1874-7655 DO - 10.3233/SJI-200674 UR - https://content.iospress.com/journals/statistical-journal-of-the-iaos/Pre-press/Pre-press AB - Policy makers depend on complex epidemiological models that are compelled to be robust, realistic, defendable and consistent with all relevant available data disclosed by official authorities which is deemed to have the highest quality standards. This paper analyses and compares the quality of official datasets available for COVID-19. We used comparative statistical analysis to evaluate the accuracy of data collection by a national (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention) and two international (World Health Organization; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) organisations based on the value of systematic measurement errors. We combined excel files, text mining techniques and manual data entries to extract the COVID-19 data from official reports and to generate an accurate profile for comparisons. The findings show noticeable and increasing measurement errors in the three datasets as the pandemic outbreak expanded and more countries contributed data for the official repositories, raising data comparability concerns and pointing to the need for better coordination and harmonized statistical methods. The study offers a COVID-19 combined dataset and dashboard with minimum systematic measurement errors, and valuable insights into the potential problems in using databanks without carefully examining the metadata and additional documentation that describe the overall context of data. ER -
Português