Exportar Publicação

Costa, P., Handke, L., König, M.  & Thieme, O. (2024). Team perceived virtuality: Empirical exploration of its two dimensions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 28 (2), 101-119

P. L. Costa et al.,  "Team perceived virtuality: Empirical exploration of its two dimensions", in Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 101-119, 2024

@article{costa2024_1734885989842,
	author = "Costa, P. and Handke, L. and König, M.  and Thieme, O.",
	title = "Team perceived virtuality: Empirical exploration of its two dimensions",
	journal = "Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice",
	year = "2024",
	volume = "28",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1037/gdn0000202",
	pages = "101-119",
	url = "https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/gdn"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Team perceived virtuality: Empirical exploration of its two dimensions
T2  - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
VL  - 28
IS  - 2
AU  - Costa, P.
AU  - Handke, L.
AU  - König, M. 
AU  - Thieme, O.
PY  - 2024
SP  - 101-119
SN  - 1089-2699
DO  - 10.1037/gdn0000202
UR  - https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/gdn
AB  - Objective: The present study aims at empirically exploring the construct of team perceived virtuality (TPV), validating its proposed bidimensional structure and predictive validity for affective and performance outcomes. Method: Three samples of 95 mix-gender, educated and Western teams, answered an online survey on team perceived virtuality (in form of collectively experienced distance and collectively experienced information deficits) teamwork engagement and team performance. Sample 1 consisted of 84 individuals, 63% female and 81% under 40 years of age. Sample 2 consisted of 68 individuals, 25% female and 64.2% under 40 years of age. Sample 3 consisted of 122 individuals, 53% female and 66% under 40 years of age. Results: The fit of a two-factor model (?² = 195.98, df = 20, p < .001, comparative fit index, CFI = 0.72, RMSEA = 0.18, SRMRwithin = 0.12) supported the bidimensional structure of the construct, and measurement invariance across samples was supported. Only distance is a significant predictor of teamwork engagement (? = −.50, p = .007); only information deficits (? = −.36, p = .076) are a significant marginal predictor of team performance; and both distance (? = −.33, p = .029) and information deficits (? = −.48, p = .002) are predictors of team adaptive performance, with the latter having a greater predictive power. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of team perceived virtuality as a team-level construct, validates its two-factor structure, and demonstrates the differential relationship between its two constituting dimensions and performance-related and affective-motivational outcomes, respectively. The generalizability of the findings is limited by samples’ characteristics.
ER  -