Exportar Publicação

Guibentif, P. (2023). Socio-legal agency in late modernity: Reappreciating the relationship between normativity and sociology of law. In Håkan Hydén, Roger Cotterrell, David Nelken, Ulrike Schultz (Ed.), Combining the legal and the social in sociology of law: An homage to Reza Banakar. (pp. 215-226). London: Hart Publishing.

P. H. Guibentif,  "Socio-legal agency in late modernity: Reappreciating the relationship between normativity and sociology of law", in Combining the legal and the social in sociology of law: An homage to Reza Banakar, Håkan Hydén, Roger Cotterrell, David Nelken, Ulrike Schultz, Ed., London, Hart Publishing, 2023, pp. 215-226

@incollection{guibentif2023_1734931866565,
	author = "Guibentif, P.",
	title = "Socio-legal agency in late modernity: Reappreciating the relationship between normativity and sociology of law",
	chapter = "",
	booktitle = "Combining the legal and the social in sociology of law: An homage to Reza Banakar",
	year = "2023",
	volume = "",
	series = "Oñati International Series in Law and Society",
	edition = "",
	pages = "215-215",
	publisher = "Hart Publishing",
	address = "London",
	url = "https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph-detail?docid=b-9781509959419&pdfid=9781509959419.ch-016.pdf&tocid=b-9781509959419-chapter16"
}

TY  - CHAP
TI  - Socio-legal agency in late modernity: Reappreciating the relationship between normativity and sociology of law
T2  - Combining the legal and the social in sociology of law: An homage to Reza Banakar
AU  - Guibentif, P.
PY  - 2023
SP  - 215-226
DO  - 10.5040/9781509959419.ch-016
CY  - London
UR  - https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph-detail?docid=b-9781509959419&pdfid=9781509959419.ch-016.pdf&tocid=b-9781509959419-chapter16
AB  - The paper takes as a starting point an article of Reza Banakar published 1998, in which he compared sociology of law with feminist scholarship, arguing, firstly, that the success of feminist scholarship would be due to the fact that feminist scholars ‘share a common ideological objective that does not exist to the same extent and with the same intensity in sociology of law’, and, secondly, that, just like feminists, who ‘freed themselves from the limitations  of the traditional and academically established disciplines’, sociology of law ‘must in the same fashion limit its dependency on both law and sociology’. - The discussion of these two arguments may offer an appropriate structure for a contribution to the debate about the relationship between sociology of law and normative debates. In a first part, a case for a possible ideological objective for the Sociology of Law will be put forward. In a second part, the relationship between Law and Sociology will be discussed, with a view to this objective, proposing one possible understanding of Banakar’s programme of ‘Merging Law and Sociology’. 
ER  -