Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Guibentif, P. (2023). Knowledge and Opinion About Open Science. “Law, Society and Digital Pasts, Presents, and Futures”, 2023 RCSL (Research Committee on Sociology of Law) Annual Meeting, University of Lund, Department of Sociology of Law, 30 August-1 September 2023.
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
P. H. Guibentif,  "Knowledge and Opinion About Open Science", in “Law, Society and Digital Pasts, Presents, and Futures”, 2023 RCSL (Research Committee on Sociology of Law) Annu. Meeting, University of Lund, Department of Sociology of Law, 30 August-1 September 2023, Lund, 2023
Exportar BibTeX
@misc{guibentif2023_1734933434938,
	author = "Guibentif, P.",
	title = "Knowledge and Opinion About Open Science",
	year = "2023",
	howpublished = "Outro",
	url = "https://rcsl.hypotheses.org/2023-rcsl-meeting-in-lund"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Knowledge and Opinion About Open Science
T2  - “Law, Society and Digital Pasts, Presents, and Futures”, 2023 RCSL (Research Committee on Sociology of Law) Annual Meeting, University of Lund, Department of Sociology of Law, 30 August-1 September 2023
AU  - Guibentif, P.
PY  - 2023
CY  - Lund
UR  - https://rcsl.hypotheses.org/2023-rcsl-meeting-in-lund
AB  - The world of scientific research is currently experiencing an important normative change, with the implementation of open science policies. This process offers to socio-legal research an excellent opportunity to undertake a reflexive research effort, having to apply the concepts developed for the approach of knowledge and opinion about the law to our own domain of activity. Such reflexive research is likely to enrich our knowledge about a much broader process within the framework of which open science is being implemented, which is the digitalization of our societies. In this context, one more specific issue deserves a special focus, considering its current relevance for scientific practice, in the socio-legal domain as well as in other domains: the relationship between specialists and lay persons. An issue that raises normative questions which discussion is strongly conditioned by open science policies, and by the way these policies are perceived and implemented. My paper will be based on information gathered in the process of implementation of open science policies in France, in particular by the CNRS and by, among others, one university, Université Paris-Saclay, two institutions to the policies of which the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Paris-Saclay, which I am currently running, has actively to contribute.
ER  -