Exportar Publicação

Handke, L., Costa, P. & Feitosa, J. (N/A). How virtual are we? Introducing the Team Perceived Virtuality Scale. Journal of Business and Psychology. N/A

L. Handke et al.,  "How virtual are we? Introducing the Team Perceived Virtuality Scale", in Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. N/A, N/A

@article{handkeN/A_1732197888267,
	author = "Handke, L. and Costa, P. and Feitosa, J.",
	title = "How virtual are we? Introducing the Team Perceived Virtuality Scale",
	journal = "Journal of Business and Psychology",
	year = "N/A",
	volume = "N/A",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1007/s10869-024-09966-3",
	url = "https://link.springer.com/journal/10869"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How virtual are we? Introducing the Team Perceived Virtuality Scale
T2  - Journal of Business and Psychology
VL  - N/A
AU  - Handke, L.
AU  - Costa, P.
AU  - Feitosa, J.
PY  - N/A
SN  - 0889-3268
DO  - 10.1007/s10869-024-09966-3
UR  - https://link.springer.com/journal/10869
AB  - With the strong proliferation of virtual teams across various organizations and contexts, understanding how virtuality affects teamwork has become fundamental to team and organizational effectiveness. However, current conceptualizations of virtuality rely almost exclusively on more or less fixed, structural features, such as the degree of technology reliance. In this paper, we take a socio-constructivist perspective on team virtuality, focusing on individuals’ experience of team virtuality, which may vary across teams and time points with similar structural features. More specifically, we develop and validate a scale that captures the construct of Team Perceived Virtuality (Handke et al., 2021). Following a description of item development and content validity, we present the results of four different studies that demonstrate the construct’s structural, discriminant, and criterion validity with an overall number of 2,294 teams. The final instrument comprises 10 items that measure the two dimensions of Team Perceived Virtuality (collectively-experienced distance and collectively-experienced information deficits) with five items each. This final scale showed a very good fit to a two-dimensional structure both at individual and team levels and adequate psychometric properties including aggregation indices. We further provide evidence for conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of the two TPV dimensions based on related team constructs, and for criterion validity, showing the expected significant relationships with leader-rated interaction quality and team performance. Lastly, we generalize results from student project teams to an organizational team sample. Accordingly, this scale can enhance both research and practice as a validated instrument to address how team virtuality is experienced.
ER  -