Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA)
Üzelgün, M. A. , Giannouli, I., Archontaki, I., Odstrčilová, K., Thomass, B. & Álvares, C. (2024). Transforming toxic debates towards European futures: Technological disruption, societal fragmentation, and enlightenment 2.0. Central European Journal of Communication, 17(1(35)), 82?102. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).711
Export Reference (IEEE)
M. A. Uzelgun et al.,  "Transforming toxic debates towards European futures: Technological disruption, societal fragmentation, and enlightenment 2.0", in Central European Journal of Communication, vol. 17, no. 1(35), pp. 82-102, 2024
Export BibTeX
@article{uzelgun2024_1790052681543,
	author = "Üzelgün, M. A.  and Giannouli, I. and Archontaki, I. and Odstrčilová, K. and Thomass, B. and Álvares, C.",
	title = "Transforming toxic debates towards European futures: Technological disruption, societal fragmentation, and enlightenment 2.0",
	journal = "Central European Journal of Communication",
	year = "2024",
	volume = "17",
	number = "1(35)",
	doi = "10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).711",
	pages = "82-102",
	url = "https://journals.ptks.pl/cejc/about"
}
Export RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Transforming toxic debates towards European futures: Technological disruption, societal fragmentation, and enlightenment 2.0
T2  - Central European Journal of Communication
VL  - 17
IS  - 1(35)
AU  - Üzelgün, M. A. 
AU  - Giannouli, I.
AU  - Archontaki, I.
AU  - Odstrčilová, K.
AU  - Thomass, B.
AU  - Álvares, C.
PY  - 2024
SP  - 82-102
SN  - 1899-5101
DO  - 10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).711
UR  - https://journals.ptks.pl/cejc/about
AB  - Online toxicity refers to a spectrum of problematic communicative phenomena that unfold in various ways on social media platforms. Most of the current efforts to contain it focus on computational techniques to detect online toxicity and build a regulatory architecture. In this paper, we highlight the importance of focusing on the social phenomena of toxicity, and particularly, exploring the public understanding and future imaginaries of toxic debates. To explore how users construe online toxicity and envisage the future of online discussions, we examine 41 scenarios produced by European experts from the field of technology and culture. Through a content analysis informed by a narrative approach and insights from futures studies, we identify three myths that characterize the future scenarios: technological disruption, societal fragmentation, and digital Enlightenment. After a discussion of their relations, we conclude by stressing the importance of platform transparency and user empowerment.
ER  -