Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Chang, W.-L., Benson, V. & Pereira, R. (2024). Revisiting mobile payment risk-reduction strategies: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 34 (4), 318-337
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
W. Chang et al.,  "Revisiting mobile payment risk-reduction strategies: A cross-country analysis", in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 318-337, 2024
Exportar BibTeX
@article{chang2024_1730877819597,
	author = "Chang, W.-L. and Benson, V. and Pereira, R.",
	title = "Revisiting mobile payment risk-reduction strategies: A cross-country analysis",
	journal = "Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce",
	year = "2024",
	volume = "34",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.1080/10919392.2024.2386755",
	pages = "318-337",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/hoce20"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Revisiting mobile payment risk-reduction strategies: A cross-country analysis
T2  - Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce
VL  - 34
IS  - 4
AU  - Chang, W.-L.
AU  - Benson, V.
AU  - Pereira, R.
PY  - 2024
SP  - 318-337
SN  - 1091-9392
DO  - 10.1080/10919392.2024.2386755
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/hoce20
AB  - Mobile payment risk has become a critical cybersecurity factor in the cashless society. The outbreak of COVID-19 helped proliferate mobile payments that also bring significant risks to users. Using AI methods, this study analyzed six dimensions of mobile payment risks (financial, privacy, performance, psychology, time, and security) in a survey of 748 respondents from three countries (UK, Taiwan, and Mozambique). The decision tree method was employed to identify and analyze critical perceived risks. The ANOVA test provided insights on the perceived risks between countries. The ANOVA test showed that UK users were concerned about financial and time risks; those in Mozambique were concerned about performance, psychological, and security risks; and those in Taiwan were concerned about privacy risks. The results revealed that decision trees outperformed other methods (such as neural networks, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and Naïve Bayes models). Performance risk (Taiwan and Mozambique) and security risk (UK) are the most significant factors. Cultural differences influence mobile payment risk perception in different countries. The risk-reduction strategies were also matched to the critical factors by the decision tree. This showed that simplification and risk-sharing strategies were the major tactics in all three countries. The clarification strategy works for Taiwan and Mozambique, which focuses on the benefits of using mobile payments. The results suggest that enterprises should improve and simplify the mobile payment process and collaborate with the third parties to reduce and share cybersecurity risk.
ER  -