Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Candido, Marcia., Otávio Zilioli Catelano, Mariana Miggiolaro Chaguri, Danusa Marques, Vanessa Elias de Oliveira & Flávia Biroli (2023). Inequalities Among Political Scientists: Race and Gender Relations During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PS: Political Science & Politics. 56 (3), 365-372
M. R. Candido et al., "Inequalities Among Political Scientists: Race and Gender Relations During the COVID-19 Pandemic", in PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 365-372, 2023
@article{candido2023_1732396220834, author = "Candido, Marcia. and Otávio Zilioli Catelano and Mariana Miggiolaro Chaguri and Danusa Marques and Vanessa Elias de Oliveira and Flávia Biroli", title = "Inequalities Among Political Scientists: Race and Gender Relations During the COVID-19 Pandemic", journal = "PS: Political Science & Politics", year = "2023", volume = "56", number = "3", doi = "10.1017/S1049096523000197", pages = "365-372", url = "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/inequalities-among-political-scientists-race-and-gender-relations-during-the-covid19-pandemic/1BC50D19CE6D72820257E7FF3A28FD09" }
TY - JOUR TI - Inequalities Among Political Scientists: Race and Gender Relations During the COVID-19 Pandemic T2 - PS: Political Science & Politics VL - 56 IS - 3 AU - Candido, Marcia. AU - Otávio Zilioli Catelano AU - Mariana Miggiolaro Chaguri AU - Danusa Marques AU - Vanessa Elias de Oliveira AU - Flávia Biroli PY - 2023 SP - 365-372 SN - 1049-0965 DO - 10.1017/S1049096523000197 UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/inequalities-among-political-scientists-race-and-gender-relations-during-the-covid19-pandemic/1BC50D19CE6D72820257E7FF3A28FD09 AB - This study examines the division of labor among political scientists during different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. The article explores the hypothesis that the pandemic increased inequalities, especially by exacerbating the burden of housework and care responsibilities for women. We ground our analysis on the results of two surveys conducted in Brazil: one shortly after the onset of the pandemic in June 2020; and the other, more recently, from March 2022, after the ending of social-distancing measures. Brazil is a relevant case study because it was an epicenter of the virus for many months. This public health crisis occurred while a denialist and authoritarian government was in power. Considering gender and race variables, the data show a transformation of the dynamics of time organization during the period. At the beginning of the pandemic, men—primarily white men—devoted more time to academic work; in 2022, the most substantive difference was one of race. We observed a greater convergence among white people, as opposed to Black people, about household chores, with the latter group more overloaded than the former group. Traditional class and race inequalities concerning the Brazilian population can contribute to the explanation for this. When in-person work returned, white political scientists began to outsource domestic care more than their nonwhite counterparts. ER -