Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Candido, Marcia., Fernanda Beigel, Ana María Almeida, Osvaldo Gallardo, Luciano Digiampietri, Soledad Gomez...Mario Pecheny (2023). Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina. Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines. 42, 255-280
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. R. Candido et al.,  "Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina", in Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines, no. 42, pp. 255-280, 2023
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{candido2023_1732207797295,
	author = "Candido, Marcia. and Fernanda Beigel and Ana María Almeida and Osvaldo Gallardo and Luciano Digiampietri and Soledad Gomez and Marcia Rangel Candido and Alejandra Ciriza and Pia Rossomando and Marilia Moschkovich and Mario Pecheny",
	title = "Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina",
	journal = "Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines",
	year = "2023",
	volume = "",
	number = "42",
	doi = "10.4000/rhsh.8374",
	pages = "255-280",
	url = "https://journals.openedition.org/rhsh/8374"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina
T2  - Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines
IS  - 42
AU  - Candido, Marcia.
AU  - Fernanda Beigel
AU  - Ana María Almeida
AU  - Osvaldo Gallardo
AU  - Luciano Digiampietri
AU  - Soledad Gomez
AU  - Marcia Rangel Candido
AU  - Alejandra Ciriza
AU  - Pia Rossomando
AU  - Marilia Moschkovich
AU  - Mario Pecheny
PY  - 2023
SP  - 255-280
SN  - 1622-468X
DO  - 10.4000/rhsh.8374
UR  - https://journals.openedition.org/rhsh/8374
AB  - Despite their relatively similar national contexts, geographical proximity, and comparable historical and cultural experiences, Brazil and Argentina show relevant differences in terms of R&D systems, research assessment procedures and the morphology of their academic elites. However, they share similar paths of integration to the international academic arena, along with the prevalence of nationally oriented groups under a primarily public funding system. Diverse combinations of intersectional inequalities can be found when analyzing two concrete populations of researchers from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), given that we are dealing with highly internationalized academic elites. In this paper, we describe the two national fields and the target populations in terms of age, position, and institutional affiliation. Considering the different composition by sex of these two populations we observe meaningful analogies regarding publication and, especially, publication in English. Finally, we discuss author positions, showing how intersectional inequalities affect women, relating this general picture to citation impact in Google Scholar and describing how gender territories are built among the top cited researchers.

ER  -