Exportar Publicação

Machado, H., de Freitas, C., Fiske, A., Radhuber, I., Silva, S., Grimaldo-Rodríguez, C. O. ...Marelli, L. (2024). Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal. Public Understanding of Science. 33 (4), 466-482

H. C. Machado et al.,  "Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal", in Public Understanding of Science, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 466-482, 2024

@article{machado2024_1765400451326,
	author = "Machado, H. and de Freitas, C. and Fiske, A. and Radhuber, I. and Silva, S. and Grimaldo-Rodríguez, C. O.  and Botrugno, C. and Kinner, R. and Marelli, L.",
	title = "Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal",
	journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
	year = "2024",
	volume = "33",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.1177/09636625231220219",
	pages = "466-482",
	url = "https://journals.sagepub.com/home/PUS"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal
T2  - Public Understanding of Science
VL  - 33
IS  - 4
AU  - Machado, H.
AU  - de Freitas, C.
AU  - Fiske, A.
AU  - Radhuber, I.
AU  - Silva, S.
AU  - Grimaldo-Rodríguez, C. O. 
AU  - Botrugno, C.
AU  - Kinner, R.
AU  - Marelli, L.
PY  - 2024
SP  - 466-482
SN  - 0963-6625
DO  - 10.1177/09636625231220219
UR  - https://journals.sagepub.com/home/PUS
AB  - Research about science and publics in the COVID-19 pandemic often focuses on public trust and on identifying and correcting public attitudes. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 209 residents in six countries—Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal—this article uses the concept of performativity to explore how participants understand, and relate to science, in the COVID-19 context. By performativity, we mean the ways by which participants understand themselves as particular sorts of publics through identification with, and differentiation from, various other actors in matters that are perceived as controversies surrounding science: COVID-19 vaccination, media communication of science, and the interactions between governments and scientists. The criteria used to construct the similarities and differences among publics were heterogeneous and fluid, showing how epistemic beliefs about the nature of, and trust in, scientific knowledge are intermingled with social and cultural memberships embedded in specific contexts and across disparate places.
ER  -