Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Da Silva, R. & Dixit, P.  (2024). Memorializing (violent) resistance to authoritarianism: challenges and tensions at Portugal’s Aljube Museum - resistance and freedom. Critical Military Studies. N/A, 1-25
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
R. B. Silva and P. Dixit,  "Memorializing (violent) resistance to authoritarianism: challenges and tensions at Portugal’s Aljube Museum - resistance and freedom", in Critical Military Studies, vol. N/A, pp. 1-25, 2024
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{silva2024_1776204364880,
	author = "Da Silva, R. and Dixit, P. ",
	title = "Memorializing (violent) resistance to authoritarianism: challenges and tensions at Portugal’s Aljube Museum - resistance and freedom",
	journal = "Critical Military Studies",
	year = "2024",
	volume = "N/A",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1080/23337486.2024.2424059",
	pages = "1-25",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rcms20"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Memorializing (violent) resistance to authoritarianism: challenges and tensions at Portugal’s Aljube Museum - resistance and freedom
T2  - Critical Military Studies
VL  - N/A
AU  - Da Silva, R.
AU  - Dixit, P. 
PY  - 2024
SP  - 1-25
SN  - 2333-7486
DO  - 10.1080/23337486.2024.2424059
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rcms20
AB  - Museums play a critical role in constituting and communicating narratives about historical violence and connecting them to contemporary and future concerns. In this paper, we examine the memorialization of resistance movements, especially resistance to authoritarianism and state violence, as exemplified at the Aljube Museum – Resistance and Freedom in Lisbon, Portugal. We offer a methodological and theoretical discussion on storytelling and autoethnography in understanding the narratives of historical violence and war, focusing on representations of historical resistance movements and their uses of violence. We argue that the museum has avoided grappling with armed resistance as a method of effecting change and challenging authoritarianism by crafting a coherent and unitary narrative about oppression and non-violent resistance that downplays violent opposition to authoritarianism. After outlining some silences noted in the museum’s representations of resistance, we offer a counter-memory that discusses the role of non-state armed actors and shows multiple ways in which historical authoritarianism has been resisted and fought.
ER  -