Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Carlson, S., França, T., Lomer, S., Resch, K., Roohi, S. & Budginaitė-Mačkinė, I. (2025). Social inequalities in international student mobility: Reviewing conceptual approaches. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 46 (6), 834-853
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
S. Carlson et al.,  "Social inequalities in international student mobility: Reviewing conceptual approaches", in British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 834-853, 2025
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{carlson2025_1765168569536,
	author = "Carlson, S. and França, T. and Lomer, S. and Resch, K. and Roohi, S. and Budginaitė-Mačkinė, I.",
	title = "Social inequalities in international student mobility: Reviewing conceptual approaches",
	journal = "British Journal of Sociology of Education",
	year = "2025",
	volume = "46",
	number = "6",
	doi = "10.1080/01425692.2025.2520288",
	pages = "834-853",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cbse20"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Social inequalities in international student mobility: Reviewing conceptual approaches
T2  - British Journal of Sociology of Education
VL  - 46
IS  - 6
AU  - Carlson, S.
AU  - França, T.
AU  - Lomer, S.
AU  - Resch, K.
AU  - Roohi, S.
AU  - Budginaitė-Mačkinė, I.
PY  - 2025
SP  - 834-853
SN  - 0142-5692
DO  - 10.1080/01425692.2025.2520288
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cbse20
AB  - In recent years, research on international student mobility (ISM) has increased considerably. One recurring topic within this emerging interdisciplinary research field deals with the various social inequalities that exist in relation to accessing and participating in this form of mobility. However, while methodological and empirical aspects are becoming ever more refined, there is a paucity of discussion in relation to its theoretical concerns. Against this background, this paper provides a review of the main theoretical-conceptual approaches currently in use for explaining inequalities in access to and the experience of ISM: rational choice theory, Bourdieusian class theory, critical race theory, intersectional and post- and decolonial perspectives. This allows us to highlight some shortcomings in the debate and possible points of convergence between these approaches while suggesting new avenues for future research on ISM-related social inequalities.
ER  -