Exportar Publicação

Gez, Y. N., Médard, C., Kamaara, E., Masese, E., Bertin, C., Chimhete, N....Wahome, E. (2025). Ghosts of bilateralism: Collaborative research on the afterlives of a Finnish-Kenyan water development project. East African Review. 60

Y. N. Gez et al.,  "Ghosts of bilateralism: Collaborative research on the afterlives of a Finnish-Kenyan water development project", in East African Review, no. 60, 2025

@article{gez2025_1764926910489,
	author = "Gez, Y. N. and Médard, C. and Kamaara, E. and Masese, E. and Bertin, C. and Chimhete, N. and Eichhorn, B. and Fouéré, M.-A.  and Githogori, H. and Huotari, I. and Jerobon, R. and Kauppinen, A.-R. and Kagan, M. and Kosgei, M. and Kroeker, L. and Kuenberg, K. and Matusse, A. and Mugambi, M. and Mule, L. and Mutalemwa, G. and Ngure, F. and Nipassa, O. and Owiwa, S. and Nyagaya, S. and Ramos, M. J. and Schubinger, E. and Umulkher, A. and Wahome, E.",
	title = "Ghosts of bilateralism: Collaborative research on the afterlives of a Finnish-Kenyan water development project",
	journal = "East African Review",
	year = "2025",
	volume = "",
	number = "60",
	doi = "10.4000/14g4m",
	url = "https://journals.openedition.org/eastafrica/4914"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ghosts of bilateralism: Collaborative research on the afterlives of a Finnish-Kenyan water development project
T2  - East African Review
IS  - 60
AU  - Gez, Y. N.
AU  - Médard, C.
AU  - Kamaara, E.
AU  - Masese, E.
AU  - Bertin, C.
AU  - Chimhete, N.
AU  - Eichhorn, B.
AU  - Fouéré, M.-A. 
AU  - Githogori, H.
AU  - Huotari, I.
AU  - Jerobon, R.
AU  - Kauppinen, A.-R.
AU  - Kagan, M.
AU  - Kosgei, M.
AU  - Kroeker, L.
AU  - Kuenberg, K.
AU  - Matusse, A.
AU  - Mugambi, M.
AU  - Mule, L.
AU  - Mutalemwa, G.
AU  - Ngure, F.
AU  - Nipassa, O.
AU  - Owiwa, S.
AU  - Nyagaya, S.
AU  - Ramos, M. J.
AU  - Schubinger, E.
AU  - Umulkher, A.
AU  - Wahome, E.
PY  - 2025
DO  - 10.4000/14g4m
UR  - https://journals.openedition.org/eastafrica/4914
AB  - With rising academic interest in heterodox perspectives on international development interventions, including their unintended consequences and so-called “afterlives” (Rudnyckyj and Schwittay 2014; McKay 2012; Gez 2021), identifying suitable research approaches to capture such complex aftermaths emerges as a new challenge for development studies. In what follows, we share insights from our attempt to adapt an existing research approach to generate evidence on development’s afterlives, including the cascading and unintended effects of past development projects, both tangible and
intangible.1 In particular, we explore the valence of qualitative-ethnographic methods for diving deeply into the plurality of projects’ lasting legacies, well beyond their formal temporal and geographic boundaries.
ER  -