Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Ramos, M. (2025). Beyond Ethnic Strife: Ethiopia’s new alignments and the global entanglements of localised violence. Addressing Political Violence in the Horn of Africa: Origins, Current Dynamics and Future Trends - 22nd International Conference of Ethiopian Studies (ICES22). Hawassa University, Ethiopia (28 Setembro – 3 Outubro).
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. J. Ramos,  "Beyond Ethnic Strife: Ethiopia’s new alignments and the global entanglements of localised violence", in Addressing Political Violence in the Horn of Africa: Origins, Current Dynamics and Future Trends - 22nd Int. Conf. of Ethiopian Studies (ICES22). Hawassa University, Ethiopia (28 Setembro – 3 Outubro), Hawassa, 2025
Exportar BibTeX 
@misc{ramos2025_1780595969347,
	author = "Ramos, M.",
	title = "Beyond Ethnic Strife: Ethiopia’s new alignments and the global entanglements of localised violence",
	year = "2025",
	howpublished = "Ambos (impresso e digital)",
	url = "https://ices22.hu.edu.et/"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Beyond Ethnic Strife: Ethiopia’s new alignments and the global entanglements of localised violence
T2  - Addressing Political Violence in the Horn of Africa: Origins, Current Dynamics and Future Trends - 22nd International Conference of Ethiopian Studies (ICES22). Hawassa University, Ethiopia (28 Setembro – 3 Outubro)
AU  - Ramos, M.
PY  - 2025
CY  - Hawassa
UR  - https://ices22.hu.edu.et/
AB  - This talk examines a defining paradox: Ethiopia’s pursuit of sovereign autonomy through new global alliances coincides with a dramatic intensification of internal violence. Is this a contradiction, or does it reveal limits in our analysis? Ernst Gombrich’s rabbit-duck: one image can be seen as either animal, but not both. Our perception is conditioned by what we expect to see. Similarly, the dominant frameworks for understanding Ethiopia—the rabbit of ‘proxy competition’ or the duck of ‘ethnic strife’—force a singular, closed interpretation. The paradox appears because we use inadequate tools. Our task is to hold both images together and to trace how a sovereign foreign policy reconfigures internal capacities and incentives, often with violent consequences. This requires a structural analysis that bridges international relations with anthropology, examining how global systems interact with local social structures to produce outcomes on the ground.
ER  -