Exportar Publicação

Nascimento, I. & Paio, A. (2025). Reframing Architectural Education: Nurturing the Architect’s Nature Through Utopian and Radical Pedagogies. Nurture: Cultivating Care, Creativity and Collaboration in Architecture .

I. C. Nascimento and A. C. Paio,  "Reframing Architectural Education: Nurturing the Architect’s Nature Through Utopian and Radical Pedagogies", in Nurture: Cultivating Care, Creativity and Collaboration in Architecture , Bristol, 2025

@misc{nascimento2025_1788458924692,
	author = "Nascimento, I. and Paio, A.",
	title = "Reframing Architectural Education: Nurturing the Architect’s Nature Through Utopian and Radical Pedagogies",
	year = "2025",
	howpublished = "Digital",
	url = "https://rise.articulate.com/share/BubbuE3wnJRaS8GUcxru0vOvEEBy63wc#/lessons/ZfbM58CN-HaEYNES8pJc4H5BJUTNHE9e"
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Reframing Architectural Education: Nurturing the Architect’s Nature Through Utopian and Radical Pedagogies
T2  - Nurture: Cultivating Care, Creativity and Collaboration in Architecture 
AU  - Nascimento, I.
AU  - Paio, A.
PY  - 2025
CY  - Bristol
UR  - https://rise.articulate.com/share/BubbuE3wnJRaS8GUcxru0vOvEEBy63wc#/lessons/ZfbM58CN-HaEYNES8pJc4H5BJUTNHE9e
AB  - Architectural Education is struggling to prepare students for the complex social, environmental, and technological challenges of the twenty-first century. Traditional pedagogical models seem insufficient for the profession's evolving demands, often remaining disconnected from real-world contexts and constraining the imaginative, critical thinking needed today. In response, this research identifies the core competencies that today’s architect must nurture. It then explores whether utopian and radical imagination, when translated into countercultural teaching practices, can effectively respond to these needs.
This study proposes a five-layer analytical framework as both a diagnostic and propositional tool. Rather than a static model, it functions as an iterative map, tracing how core Architectural competencies are activated by specific parameters of utopian and radical thought: from modes of thinking and acting, to conceptual ideals, to observable pedagogical indicators. The goal is to map a path toward structural transformations in the way Architecture is taught and practiced.
To assess its applicability, the framework is applied to three illustrative case studies: the post-revolutionary SAAL Process in Portugal (1974–76), Lina Bo Bardi’s pedagogical vision for FAU-USP (1957), and the ongoing In Situ Laboratory (2012–present). The analysis reveals that the most impactful pedagogies are never purely utopian or radical, but emerge from a dynamic synthesis of both. By consciously nurturing the architect’s innate utopian and radical nature, AE can cultivate a new generation of professionals equipped with the critical, systemic, and imaginative capacities our world requires.
ER  -