Exportar Publicação

Ferreira Dias, João. (2026). Opening the Political Pipeline: Transparency and Civic Access to Party Lists as an Antidote to Populist Distrust.

J. B. Dias,  "Opening the Political Pipeline: Transparency and Civic Access to Party Lists as an Antidote to Populist Distrust.",, 2026

@techreport{dias2026_1772941089692,
	author = "Ferreira Dias, João.",
	title = "Opening the Political Pipeline: Transparency and Civic Access to Party Lists as an Antidote to Populist Distrust.",
	year = "2026",
	number = "",
	institution = "",
	address = "",
	url = "https://www.populismstudies.org/opening-the-political-pipeline-transparency-and-civic-access-to-party-lists-as-an-antidote-to-populist-distrust/"
}

TY  - RPRT
TI  - Opening the Political Pipeline: Transparency and Civic Access to Party Lists as an Antidote to Populist Distrust.
AU  - Ferreira Dias, João.
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.55271/pop0006
UR  - https://www.populismstudies.org/opening-the-political-pipeline-transparency-and-civic-access-to-party-lists-as-an-antidote-to-populist-distrust/
AB  - The erosion of trust in liberal democracy – and the dynamic, described by Yascha Mounk, of a growing separation between democracy and liberalism – should be understood in a context of hyper-surveillance, that is, hyper-vigilance and intensified scrutiny. The massification of education and the acceleration and fragmentation of the media environment (online news and social media) have made a persistent social and experiential gap between voters and elected officials increasingly difficult to sustain politically—one that previously drew much of its legitimacy from the formal act of voting and from longer electoral cycles. In this setting, the demand for illiberal solutions emerges plausibly from disenchantment with politics, driven by three factors: (i) civic participation reduced to electoral moments; (ii) thin representative linkages that weaken proximity and blur accountability; and (iii) the perception that political parties function as closed recruitment machines, with internal circuits of elite reproduction and low permeability to merit and to extra-partisan social experience. When integrity failures and scandals compound these conditions, a narrative of moralization and “purification” intensifies and broadens populist repertoires, both in bottom-up variants on the radical left and in broad-based variants on the radical right—directed upward against elites and, at times, downward against minorities and immigrants. The paper’s point of departure is that citizens tolerate delegation when liberal democracy is perceived as functional and fair, particularly in the delivery of the welfare state and in the integrity of fiscal governance. Within a European framework, the paper proposes measures to increase transparency in list formation and open political recruitment (including regulated civic pathways into party lists) as a way to reduce the credibility of populist antagonism and strengthen democratic resilience.

ER  -