Exportar Publicação

Ulug, M. & Andrei, R. (2025). Energy transition under twin shocks: Geopolitical and macrofinancial risks. Energy Economics. 151

M. Ulug and R. G. Andrei,  "Energy transition under twin shocks: Geopolitical and macrofinancial risks", in Energy Economics, vol. 151, 2025

@article{ulug2025_1776209977999,
	author = "Ulug, M. and Andrei, R.",
	title = "Energy transition under twin shocks: Geopolitical and macrofinancial risks",
	journal = "Energy Economics",
	year = "2025",
	volume = "151",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108949",
	url = "https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-economics"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Energy transition under twin shocks: Geopolitical and macrofinancial risks
T2  - Energy Economics
VL  - 151
AU  - Ulug, M.
AU  - Andrei, R.
PY  - 2025
SN  - 0140-9883
DO  - 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108949
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-economics
AB  - The Greater North European Energy Corridor (GNEEC) – comprising Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom - stands as a vital core for Europe’s renewable energy ambitions, while facing rising geopolitical and macro-financial pressures. This study explores how Composite Geopolitical Risk (CGR) and macro-financial pressure have driven the energy transition within the GNEEC from 1990 to 2023, alongside the roles of economic growth and environmental innovation. Using the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) approach, the results reveal strong heterogeneity along the green transition pathway. CGR has a consistently positive and rising effect on renewable deployment ( ≈ 1.05 at ? = 0.1 to ≈ 1.81 at ? = 0.9), showing that geopolitical tensions accelerate diversification, especially among transition leaders. In contrast, macro-financial pressures driven by monetary tightening hinder renewables ( ≈  0.44 at ? = 0.1 to ≈  0.27 at ? = 0.9), with financing costs constraining early-stage adopters more severely. Similarly, economic growth slows the clean share ( ≈  77 at ? = 0.1 to ≈  1.25 at ? = 0.9), as rebound and scale effects outweigh short-term efficiency gains. Environmental innovation fosters renewables at lower quantiles ( ≈ 1.50 at ? = 0.1 to ≈ 0.73 at ? = 0.9) but becomes insignificant at advanced stages, reflecting diminishing marginal returns. These findings highlight structural asymmetries: leaders convert geopolitical risk into faster deployment, while laggards remain more vulnerable to financial constraints. The study offers clear
policy implications, including strengthening de-risking mechanisms, aligning growth with low-carbon strategies, and fostering innovation diffusion, in order to balance energy resilience, security, and financial sustainability across varying stages of the transition.
ER  -