Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
De Bonte, L., Vanbavinckhove, J., Goubert, L., Baert, F., Pype, P., Schelfout, S....Ceuterick, M. (N/A). Dependence vs. addiction: A critical discourse analysis of Belgian policy documents on opioid use in chronic pain management. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. N/A
Export Reference (IEEE) 
L. D. Bonte et al.,  "Dependence vs. addiction: A critical discourse analysis of Belgian policy documents on opioid use in chronic pain management", in Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, vol. N/A, N/A
Export BibTeX 
@article{bonteN/A_1771963541500,
	author = "De Bonte, L. and Vanbavinckhove, J. and Goubert, L. and Baert, F. and Pype, P. and Schelfout, S. and Bernardes, S. and Morlion, B. and Ceuterick, M.",
	title = "Dependence vs. addiction: A critical discourse analysis of Belgian policy documents on opioid use in chronic pain management",
	journal = "Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy",
	year = "N/A",
	volume = "N/A",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1080/09687637.2026.2622378",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/idep20"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dependence vs. addiction: A critical discourse analysis of Belgian policy documents on opioid use in chronic pain management
T2  - Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy
VL  - N/A
AU  - De Bonte, L.
AU  - Vanbavinckhove, J.
AU  - Goubert, L.
AU  - Baert, F.
AU  - Pype, P.
AU  - Schelfout, S.
AU  - Bernardes, S.
AU  - Morlion, B.
AU  - Ceuterick, M.
PY  - N/A
SN  - 0968-7637
DO  - 10.1080/09687637.2026.2622378
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/idep20
AB  - Background
Opioids occupy an ambivalent position in contemporary healthcare: they are recognized as effective pain relief but remain heavily stigmatized due to their association with addiction. Drawing on Scambler’s stigma framework, this article examines how Belgian Dutch-language policy documents construct the concepts of ‘dependence’ and ‘addiction’ in the context of chronic pain management.
Methods
We analyzed 32 policy documents on opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain using Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis to explore how language reflects and reproduces power relations and ideologies.
Results
We constructed two distinct discourses. Dependence is typically framed biomedically as a physiological outcome of long-term opioid use, positioning physicians as central to prevention and monitoring. Addiction, by contrast, is constructed as a complex risk associated with opioid treatment, where patients are portrayed as morally accountable and physicians as responsible for detecting psychosocial vulnerabilities and intervening early.
Conclusion
The biomedical framing of dependence shifts moral responsibility to the medicated body, reinforcing physician authority while obscuring patients’ lived experiences. The addiction discourse extends moral accountability to prescribers, emphasizing professional responsibility for risk management. Together, these discourses embed stigma within institutional practices, reconfiguring rather than removing moral judgment and shaping how responsibility, deviance, and control are understood in healthcare.
ER  -