Exportar Publicação

Ana R. Pinho, Catarina Vitorino, Rodrigues, L., Santos, D., Nogueira, C. & Oliveira, J.M. (2026). Sexuality and disability in Portugal: perspectives from a disability rights activist movement. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 1-13

A. R. Pinho et al.,  "Sexuality and disability in Portugal: perspectives from a disability rights activist movement", in Culture, Health & Sexuality, pp. 1-13, 2026

@article{pinho2026_1777389245726,
	author = "Ana R. Pinho and Catarina Vitorino and Rodrigues, L. and Santos, D. and Nogueira, C. and Oliveira, J.M.",
	title = "Sexuality and disability in Portugal: perspectives from a disability rights activist movement",
	journal = "Culture, Health & Sexuality",
	year = "2026",
	volume = "",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1080/13691058.2026.2661301",
	pages = "1-13",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691058.2026.2661301#abstract"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sexuality and disability in Portugal: perspectives from a disability rights activist movement
T2  - Culture, Health & Sexuality
AU  - Ana R. Pinho
AU  - Catarina Vitorino
AU  - Rodrigues, L.
AU  - Santos, D.
AU  - Nogueira, C.
AU  - Oliveira, J.M.
PY  - 2026
SP  - 1-13
SN  - 1369-1058
DO  - 10.1080/13691058.2026.2661301
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691058.2026.2661301#abstract
AB  - This study explores the intersection of disability and sexuality in Portugal through the experiences of a disability rights social collective. Historically, disability has been framed by models that often disregard sexuality, leading to the desexualisation and stigmatisation of disabled people. The Independent Living Movement, while addressing sexuality, reclaims self-determination and control over one’s life. The research was conducted with members of a feminist anti-ableist activist collective established in Portugal in 2020, selected for its critical approach to the intersection of gender and disability. Data collection between October 2023 and July 2024 occurred across three phases - initial exploratory interviews, semi-structured interviews, and collaborative discussion of preliminary findings. The discussions focused on models of disability, terminology, sexuality, corporalities, and the theoretical and practical aspects of support for the expression of sexuality. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two central themes were developed: ‘multiple oppressions’ and ‘dissident bodies’, highlighting systemic barriers and resistance strategies to achieve sexual autonomy. Findings provide insights into the importance of inclusive public policies and intersectional frameworks, offering a situated perspective on how collective agency can promote sexual rights as a matter of social justice.
ER  -