Exportar Publicação

Stefano Ciaffoni, Panerati, S., Policardo, G. R., Black, R., Rhonda Nicole Balzarini, Weiser, D. A....Mogilski, J. (2026). Love the way you lie: A latent class approach to defining and experiencing infidelity. European Association of Social Psychology General Meeting.

S. Ciaffoni et al.,  "Love the way you lie: A latent class approach to defining and experiencing infidelity", in European Association of Social Psychology General Meeting, Estrasburgo, 2026

@misc{ciaffoni2026_1784812841450,
	author = "Stefano Ciaffoni and Panerati, S. and Policardo, G. R. and Black, R. and Rhonda Nicole Balzarini and Weiser, D. A. and Larva, M. and Katarzyna Grunt-Mejer and Rodrigues, D. L. and Jaroslava Varella Valentova and Mogilski, J.",
	title = "Love the way you lie: A latent class approach to defining and experiencing infidelity",
	year = "2026",
	howpublished = "Digital",
	url = "https://easp2026strasbourg.com"
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Love the way you lie: A latent class approach to defining and experiencing infidelity
T2  - European Association of Social Psychology General Meeting
AU  - Stefano Ciaffoni
AU  - Panerati, S.
AU  - Policardo, G. R.
AU  - Black, R.
AU  - Rhonda Nicole Balzarini
AU  - Weiser, D. A.
AU  - Larva, M.
AU  - Katarzyna Grunt-Mejer
AU  - Rodrigues, D. L.
AU  - Jaroslava Varella Valentova
AU  - Mogilski, J.
PY  - 2026
CY  - Estrasburgo
UR  - https://easp2026strasbourg.com
AB  - Research on romantic infidelity has typically approached it as a unitary construct, or at most by distinguishing sexual from emotional betrayal. Yet, lay conceptions of infidelity may reflect a broader range of moral and relational concerns. This cross-cultural study investigated how people conceptualize infidelity and how these definitions relate to self-reported infidelity, jealousy, and negative inducements. A total of 2741 adults currently in at least one romantic relationship completed an online survey. Participants first provided an open-ended definition of infidelity; responses were content-coded into dummy variables representing themes such as sex, intimacy, deception, agreement violations, and sexual health risk. These indicators were entered into a latent class analysis, which identified five definitional profiles: Sex and intimacy-centred (≈48%), Deception-focused (≈16%), Agreement-violation (≈22%), Health-risk definers (≈6%), and Nothing counts (≈9%). The classes differed in relational orientation, self-reported infidelity, anticipated jealousy, and use of negative inducements, suggesting that definitional diversity captures distinct normative and emotional orientations toward romantic relationships.
ER  -