Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Rodrigues, D. L. (N/A). One fits all? A person-centred analysis of experiences and practices in consensual non-monogamous relationships. Psychology and Sexuality. N/A
Export Reference (IEEE) 
D. F. Rodrigues,  "One fits all? A person-centred analysis of experiences and practices in consensual non-monogamous relationships", in Psychology and Sexuality, vol. N/A, N/A
Export BibTeX 
@article{rodriguesN/A_1785918506342,
	author = "Rodrigues, D. L.",
	title = "One fits all? A person-centred analysis of experiences and practices in consensual non-monogamous relationships",
	journal = "Psychology and Sexuality",
	year = "N/A",
	volume = "N/A",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1080/19419899.2026.2711716",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rpse20"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - One fits all? A person-centred analysis of experiences and practices in consensual non-monogamous relationships
T2  - Psychology and Sexuality
VL  - N/A
AU  - Rodrigues, D. L.
PY  - N/A
SN  - 1941-9899
DO  - 10.1080/19419899.2026.2711716
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rpse20
AB  - Using a person-centred approach, we explored diversity in intimate experiences and behaviours among 439 individuals in consensual non-monogamous relationships from over 30 countries. A latent profile analysis based on relational and sexual outcomes with one partner (P1) identified three profiles: moderate satisfaction with high distress and low extradyadic desire (Profile 1); low satisfaction with high distress and high extradyadic desire (Profile 2); and high satisfaction with low distress and high extradyadic desire (Profile 3). Participants in Profiles 2 and 3 (vs. Profile 1) were more likely to report a polyamorous (vs. monogamous) configuration, longer relationship length, and non-monogamy consent and enactment (vs. consent without enactment) with P1. Participants in Profiles 2 and 3 (vs. Profile 1) were also more likely to have another partner (P2) and reported greater sexual satisfaction, lower sexual distress, and less frequent condom use with P2. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on the study of consensual non-monogamy by highlighting meaningful diversity in individuals’ experiences not fully captured by variable-centred approaches or self-identified relational labels.
ER  -