Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Mota, L. & Bruna Fernandes (2022). Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State & Society, 29(1), 50?70. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab015
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
L. F. Mota and B. Fernandes,  "Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues", in Social Politics: Int. Studies in Gender State & Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 50-70, 2022
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{mota2022_1789161316142,
	author = "Mota, L. and Bruna Fernandes",
	title = "Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues",
	journal = "Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State & Society",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "29",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1093/sp/jxab015",
	pages = "50-70",
	url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab015"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues
T2  - Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State & Society
VL  - 29
IS  - 1
AU  - Mota, L.
AU  - Bruna Fernandes
PY  - 2022
SP  - 50-70
DO  - 10.1093/sp/jxab015
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab015
AB  - In the literature on morality issues, the most famous typology distinguishes countries from the “religious” and “secular” worlds, based on the presence or absence of partisan religious cleavages. Portugal belongs to the former world, yet in 2018, the Portuguese Parliament passed a law on the self-determination of gender identity. This article asks how such an outcome was possible, focusing on the role of political parties and civil society actors within advocacy coalitions. Our analysis reveals that, in addition to the role played by civil society actors, the “change coalition” won the dispute because it assembled a majority of votes in the parliament from left-wing progressive political parties. Moreover, actors from the “change coalition” developed a clear strategy of articulation before and during the debate. In contrast, the “blocking coalition,” composed of right-wing political parties and a few health-related actors, failed to define a coherent advocacy strategy.
ER  -