Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Sousa, D., Santos, J., Rathenau, S. & Vaz, A. (N/A). “Is it really deliberate practice?” A new measure for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, N/A. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000406
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
D. Sousa et al.,  "“Is it really deliberate practice?” A new measure for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy", in Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, vol. N/A, N/A
Exportar BibTeX
@article{sousaN/A_1789198393958,
	author = "Sousa, D. and Santos, J. and Rathenau, S. and Vaz, A.",
	title = "“Is it really deliberate practice?” A new measure for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy",
	journal = "Journal of Psychotherapy Integration",
	year = "N/A",
	volume = "N/A",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1037/int0000406",
	url = "https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/int"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - “Is it really deliberate practice?” A new measure for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy
T2  - Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
VL  - N/A
AU  - Sousa, D.
AU  - Santos, J.
AU  - Rathenau, S.
AU  - Vaz, A.
PY  - N/A
SN  - 1053-0479
DO  - 10.1037/int0000406
UR  - https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/int
AB  - This study aims to develop and validate a new measure for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy, addressing the ambiguous components currently identified in the literature. A total of 442 psychotherapists participated in an online survey, providing data on their engagement in activities related to deliberate practice. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the training sample to identify the underlying structure of the measure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis on a holdout sample to validate the instrument. The final model yielded four distinct factors: goals and training, recording, collaborative feedback, and monitoring, demonstrating high reliability (composite reliability > .70) and strong validity (average variance extracted > .50). Mean scores indicated a general tendency toward higher engagement in goals and training and collaborative feedback, whereas lower scores in recording suggest the underutilization of session reviews among therapists. The newly developed measure provides a comprehensive tool for assessing deliberate practice in psychotherapy, highlighting important areas for improvement in training programs. By incorporating direct observation and structured feedback mechanisms, this instrument may enhance therapist development, improve therapeutic practices, and ultimately benefit client outcomes. 
ER  -