Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Rodrigues, N. (2026). Smart city trajectories and urban contexts: A comparative analysis of Dublin, Barcelona, and Lisbon. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 16(2), 73?92. https://doi.org/10.66428/ijppv16i02a004
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
N. M. Rodrigues,  "Smart city trajectories and urban contexts: A comparative analysis of Dublin, Barcelona, and Lisbon", in Italian Journal of Planning Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 73-92, 2026
Exportar BibTeX
@article{rodrigues2026_1791391369951,
	author = "Rodrigues, N.",
	title = "Smart city trajectories and urban contexts: A comparative analysis of Dublin, Barcelona, and Lisbon",
	journal = "Italian Journal of Planning Practice",
	year = "2026",
	volume = "16",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.66428/ijppv16i02a004",
	pages = "73-92",
	url = "https://ijpp.dicam.unitn.it/smart-city-trajectories-and-urban-contexts-a-comparative-analysis-of-dublin-barcelona-and-lisbon/"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Smart city trajectories and urban contexts: A comparative analysis of Dublin, Barcelona, and Lisbon
T2  - Italian Journal of Planning Practice
VL  - 16
IS  - 2
AU  - Rodrigues, N.
PY  - 2026
SP  - 73-92
SN  - 2239-267X
DO  - 10.66428/ijppv16i02a004
UR  - https://ijpp.dicam.unitn.it/smart-city-trajectories-and-urban-contexts-a-comparative-analysis-of-dublin-barcelona-and-lisbon/
AB  - The global diffusion of smart cities is often accompanied by narratives of technological neutrality and policy transferability. However, critical urban scholarship has shown that smart city initiatives are deeply embedded in specific geographical, socio-economic and institutional contexts. This article advances this perspective through a comparative analysis of Dublin, Barcelona and Lisbon, examining how contextual dimensions influence the governance and evolution of smart city policies and projects. Drawing on the literature on smart cities and comparative urban policy, the article conceptualises context as an explanatory dimension. It develops an analytical framework structured around two interconnected dimensions: the contextual conditions of urban smart and digital transformation and the trajectories of smart city policies and projects. Despite structural similarities as second-tier European metropolitan areas, the three cities display distinct, deeply context-embedded configurations. Dublin reflects a market-oriented and experimental approach, shaped by institutional fragmentation and a strong corporate ecosystem. Barcelona articulates a technopolitical orientation grounded in digital sovereignty and public leadership. Lisbon occupies an intermediate position, combining managerial administrative modernisation with entrepreneurial partnerships. This comparison shows that smart city policies and trajectories are strongly influenced by geographical, institutional and political-economical contexts.
ER  -