Exportar Publicação

Gietzmann, M. & Isidro, H. (2013). Institutional Investors’ Reaction to SEC Concerns about IFRS and US GAAP Reporting. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 40 (7-8), 796-841

M. Gietzmann and H. O. Isidro,  "Institutional Investors’ Reaction to SEC Concerns about IFRS and US GAAP Reporting", in Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 40, no. 7-8, pp. 796-841, 2013

@article{gietzmann2013_1732208254715,
	author = "Gietzmann, M. and Isidro, H.",
	title = "Institutional Investors’ Reaction to SEC Concerns about IFRS and US GAAP Reporting",
	journal = "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting",
	year = "2013",
	volume = "40",
	number = "7-8",
	doi = "10.1111/jbfa.12027",
	pages = "796-841",
	url = "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12027/abstract"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Institutional Investors’ Reaction to SEC Concerns about IFRS and US GAAP Reporting
T2  - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting
VL  - 40
IS  - 7-8
AU  - Gietzmann, M.
AU  - Isidro, H.
PY  - 2013
SP  - 796-841
SN  - 0306-686X
DO  - 10.1111/jbfa.12027
UR  - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12027/abstract
AB  - For the period of 2006 to 2008, we collect Comment Letters issued by the SEC that question the application of US GAAP by US firms or the application of IFRS by European firms registered with the SEC. We investigate whether institutional investors react to the letters by changing their holdings and whether their responses vary for US registrants and European registrants. We do this via a treatment-effects model in which we test the hypothesis that institutional investors rebalance their portfolio holdings because they view Comment Letters as informative public signals. We find that institutional investors reduce their equity holdings when firms receive SEC Comment Letters, and their negative reactions are most marked for low turnover institutional investors, who we use to represent those informed investors most prepared to incur costs to closely monitor firms. Next, while noting that the number of Letters questioning application of IFRS are smaller in number relative to those questioning application of US GAAP, we investigate whether there are different reactions to Comment Letters questioning different standards. We show that there is a higher probability of the SEC questioning the application of IFRS as compared to US GAAP. After controlling for firm-specific conditions that impact the issuance of a Comment Letter, we show that this higher probability has economic significance because institutional investors’ react more negatively to Comment Letters that question the application of IFRS as compared to US GAAP. A content analysis confirms the economic importance of the Comment Letters. We find that in almost half of all IFRS cases the Comment Letters request amendments to financial statements.
ER  -