Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Maria Helena Santos, Amâncio, L. & Alves, H. (2013). Gender and politics: the relevance of gender on judgements about the merit of candidates and the fairness of quotas. Portuguese Journal of Social Science. 12 (2), 133-149
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. H. Santos et al.,  "Gender and politics: the relevance of gender on judgements about the merit of candidates and the fairness of quotas", in Portuguese Journal of Social Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 133-149, 2013
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{santos2013_1731600760155,
	author = "Maria Helena Santos and Amâncio, L. and Alves, H.",
	title = "Gender and politics: the relevance of gender on judgements about the merit of candidates and the fairness of quotas",
	journal = "Portuguese Journal of Social Science",
	year = "2013",
	volume = "12",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1386/pjss.12.2.133_1",
	pages = "133-149",
	url = "http://pjss.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/pjss"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gender and politics: the relevance of gender on judgements about the merit of candidates and the fairness of quotas
T2  - Portuguese Journal of Social Science
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
AU  - Maria Helena Santos
AU  - Amâncio, L.
AU  - Alves, H.
PY  - 2013
SP  - 133-149
SN  - 1476-413X
DO  - 10.1386/pjss.12.2.133_1
UR  - http://pjss.iscte-iul.pt/index.php/pjss
AB  - Drawing on the conceptualization of meritocracy as an illusion, we argue that perceptions of merit and fairness of sex quotas in politics are influenced by gender ideology, specifically gender symbolical asymmetry, which equates men with individuals and the universal reference of 'person', and women with a sexed category. A total of 311 Portuguese participants read one of eight scenarios manipulating the sex and political competence of two candidates for an electoral list where only one would be selected. According to the experimental condition, either the female or the male candidate was presented as more competent or both candidates were presented as equally competent. In the control condition no such information was provided. Participants rated the merit of the selected candidate and the fairness of quotas. Results show that men take mostly only the candidates’ competence information into consideration. Reflecting gender symbolic asymmetry women were also influenced by the fact that the selected candidate was male or female. Results are discussed in the light of the gender symbolic asymmetry model.
ER  -