Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Costa, A. & Paixão, J. P. (2014). A dynamic programming approach for evaluating a portfolio of R&D projects with a budget. SOP Transactions on Applied Mathematics. 1 (2), 126-140
A. R. Costa and J. M. Paixão, "A dynamic programming approach for evaluating a portfolio of R&D projects with a budget", in SOP Transactions on Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 126-140, 2014
@article{costa2014_1732407021611, author = "Costa, A. and Paixão, J. P.", title = "A dynamic programming approach for evaluating a portfolio of R&D projects with a budget", journal = "SOP Transactions on Applied Mathematics", year = "2014", volume = "1", number = "2", doi = "10.15764/am.2014.02012", pages = "126-140", url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.15764/am.2014.02012" }
TY - JOUR TI - A dynamic programming approach for evaluating a portfolio of R&D projects with a budget T2 - SOP Transactions on Applied Mathematics VL - 1 IS - 2 AU - Costa, A. AU - Paixão, J. P. PY - 2014 SP - 126-140 SN - 2373-8472 DO - 10.15764/am.2014.02012 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.15764/am.2014.02012 AB - The Real Options approach has proved to be a suitable methodology for capturing the flexibility in the investment decision process. This is very useful for the financial evaluation of R&D projects where there are several possible decisions concerning to the investment – delaying, improving or abandoning. Since the risk of an R&D project is usually due to singular characteristics of the project and is uncorrelated with the financial markets, the contingent claims analysis may be not adequate to value R&D projects. Based on a dynamic programming evaluation model, presented in Huchzermeier and Loch [1], we propose an approach to valuing a portfolio of R&D projects with a budget. Specifically, considering a budget constraint, we make an extension of the model mentioned above for assessing the projects in the portfolio simultaneously. To test the proposed evaluation procedure, we generated several R&D portfolios with different dimensions and characteristics. According to our computational experience, the main conclusions are presented. ER -