Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Correia, T. (2011). An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação. 15 (38), 779-792
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
T. J. Conceição,  "An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions", in Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, vol. 15, no. 38, pp. 779-792, 2011
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{conceição2011_1765828625208,
	author = "Correia, T.",
	title = "An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions",
	journal = "Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação",
	year = "2011",
	volume = "15",
	number = "38",
	doi = "10.1590/S1414-32832011000300013",
	pages = "779-792",
	url = "http://www.scielo.br/pdf/icse/v15n38/13.pdf"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
T2  - Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação
VL  - 15
IS  - 38
AU  - Correia, T.
PY  - 2011
SP  - 779-792
SN  - 1414-3283
DO  - 10.1590/S1414-32832011000300013
UR  - http://www.scielo.br/pdf/icse/v15n38/13.pdf
AB  - This article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions.
ER  -