Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Sthör, C. & Coimbra, E. (2013). The governance of the wolf-human relationship in Europe. Review of European Studies. 5  (4), 1-18
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
C. Sthör and E. C. Almeida,  "The governance of the wolf-human relationship in Europe", in Review of European Studies, vol. 5 , no. 4, pp. 1-18, 2013
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{sthör2013_1713461425476,
	author = "Sthör, C. and Coimbra, E.",
	title = "The governance of the wolf-human relationship in Europe",
	journal = "Review of European Studies",
	year = "2013",
	volume = "5 ",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.5539/res.v5n4p1",
	pages = "1-18",
	url = "http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/view/29088"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The governance of the wolf-human relationship in Europe
T2  - Review of European Studies
VL  - 5 
IS  - 4
AU  - Sthör, C.
AU  - Coimbra, E.
PY  - 2013
SP  - 1-18
SN  - 1918-7173
DO  - 10.5539/res.v5n4p1
UR  - http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/view/29088
AB  - We analyze the architecture and functioning of wolf governance in the European Union revealing some of the dynamics between biology conservation and social management. Comparing Germany, Galicia (Spain), Portugal and Sweden as illustrative examples the paper highlights important similarities and differences in the governance conceptualizations and architectures. In the second part, the article examines struggles and challenges to the EU’s protective governance paradigm. Our findings indicate that active opposition to wolves becomes especially visible in Sweden and Germany, the two countries with the least number of wolves but their fairly recent re-appearance. We conclude that such opposition cannot be sufficiently explained by rationally grounded disadvantages due, for example, loss of farm animals caused by the large carnivores and/or insufficient compensation measures. We argue it’s more accurate to assume a clash of paradigms, which have in themselves vaster ontological, epistemological, experiential and axiological issues and which, in turn, strongly shape opinions, values and attitudes.
ER  -