Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, C., Fletcher, D....Barnett, J. (2015). ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science. 102, 49-58
W. Verbeke et al., "‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom", in Meat Science, vol. 102, pp. 49-58, 2015
@article{verbeke2015_1715096568308, author = "Verbeke, W. and Marcu, A. and Rutsaert, P. and Gaspar, R. and Seibt, C. and Fletcher, D. and Barnett, J.", title = "‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom", journal = "Meat Science", year = "2015", volume = "102", number = "", doi = "10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013", pages = "49-58", url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174014005014" }
TY - JOUR TI - ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom T2 - Meat Science VL - 102 AU - Verbeke, W. AU - Marcu, A. AU - Rutsaert, P. AU - Gaspar, R. AU - Seibt, C. AU - Fletcher, D. AU - Barnett, J. PY - 2015 SP - 49-58 SN - 0309-1740 DO - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013 UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174014005014 AB - Cultured meat has evolved from an idea and concept into a reality with the August 2013 cultured hamburger tasting in London. Still, how consumers conceive cultured meat is largely an open question. This study addresses consumers' reactions and attitude formation towards cultured meat through analyzing focus group discussions and online deliberations with 179 meat consumers from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Initial reactions when learning about cultured meat were underpinned by feelings of disgust and considerations of unnaturalness. Consumers saw few direct personal benefits but they were more open to perceiving global societal benefits relating to the environment and global food security. Both personal and societal risks were framed in terms of uncertainties about safety and health, and possible adverse societal consequences dealing with loss of farming and eating traditions and rural livelihoods. Further reflection pertained to skepticism about 'the inevitable' scientific progress, concern about risk governance and control, and need for regulation and proper labeling. ER -