Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Pereira, A. (1993). A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of corporate tax integration. Journal of Policy Modeling. 15 (1), 63-89
A. M. Pereira, "A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of corporate tax integration", in Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 63-89, 1993
@article{pereira1993_1714986847642, author = "Pereira, A.", title = "A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of corporate tax integration", journal = "Journal of Policy Modeling", year = "1993", volume = "15", number = "1", doi = "10.1016/0161-8938(93)90022-I", pages = "63-89", url = "http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38249004717&partnerID=MN8TOARS" }
TY - JOUR TI - A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of corporate tax integration T2 - Journal of Policy Modeling VL - 15 IS - 1 AU - Pereira, A. PY - 1993 SP - 63-89 SN - 0161-8938 DO - 10.1016/0161-8938(93)90022-I UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-38249004717&partnerID=MN8TOARS AB - he objective of this article is to study the intersectoral and intertemporal efficiency effects as well as the distribution effects of integrating corporate and personal income taxes. This article presents a dynamic general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. The model accomodates optimal intertemporal investment decisions and optimal allocation of investment across sectors, intertemporal household consumption/savings and labor/leisure decisions, and government deficits and financial crowding-out. Simulation results suggest that the elimination of the corporate income tax and its replacement by increased personal income tax rates would yield long-run benefits that are at best 17 percent of the present value of future consumption and leisure. Also, the average long-run gains are more than three times as large as the average short-run gains: it takes time for the efficiency gains of integration to emerge. Finally, integration is shown not to be a Pareto improvement in that low-income households are worse off after integration. ER -