Exportar Publicação

Nogueira, D. S., Ferreira, P. L., Reis, E. A. & Lopes, I. S. (2015). Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the European Portuguese eating assessment Tool (P-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 30 (5), 511-520

D. M. Nogueira et al.,  "Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the European Portuguese eating assessment Tool (P-EAT-10)", in Dysphagia, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 511-520, 2015

@article{nogueira2015_1732208052788,
	author = "Nogueira, D. S. and Ferreira, P. L. and Reis, E. A. and Lopes, I. S.",
	title = "Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the European Portuguese eating assessment Tool (P-EAT-10)",
	journal = "Dysphagia",
	year = "2015",
	volume = "30",
	number = "5",
	doi = "10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5",
	pages = "511-520",
	url = "http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the European Portuguese eating assessment Tool (P-EAT-10)
T2  - Dysphagia
VL  - 30
IS  - 5
AU  - Nogueira, D. S.
AU  - Ferreira, P. L.
AU  - Reis, E. A.
AU  - Lopes, I. S.
PY  - 2015
SP  - 511-520
SN  - 0179-051X
DO  - 10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5
AB  - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and the reliability of the European Portuguese version of the EAT-10 (P-EAT-10). This research was conducted in three phases: (i) cultural and linguistic adaptation; (ii) feasibility and reliability test; and (iii) validity tests. The final sample was formed by a cohort of 520 subjects. The P-EAT-10 index was compared for socio-demographic and clinic variables. It was also compared for both dysphagic and non-dysphagic groups as well as for the results of the 3Oz wst. Lastly, the P-EAT-10 scores were correlated with the EuroQol Group Portuguese EQ-5D index. The Cronbach’s ? obtained for the P-EAT-10 scale was 0.952 and it remained excellent even if any item was deleted. The item-total and the intraclass correlation coefficients were very good. The P-EAT-10 mean of the non-dysphagic cohort was 0.56 and that of the dysphagic cohort was 14.26, the mean comparison between the 3Oz wst groups and the P-EAT-10 scores were significant. A significant higher perception of QoL was also found among the non-dysphagic subjects. P-EAT-10 is a valid and reliable measure that may be used to document dysphagia which makes it useful both for screening in clinical practice and in research.
ER  -