Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Oliveira, Nuno (2015). Repertoires of diversity and collective boundaries. Diverging paths between Portugal and Brazil?. Max Plank Institute WP 15-08. 7-40
Export Reference (IEEE) 
N. F. Oliveira,  "Repertoires of diversity and collective boundaries. Diverging paths between Portugal and Brazil?", in Max Plank Institute WP 15-08, Göttingen, Germany, pp. 7-40, 2015
Export BibTeX 
@unpublished{oliveira2015_1716023948275,
	author = "Oliveira, Nuno",
	title = "Repertoires of diversity and collective boundaries. Diverging paths between Portugal and Brazil?",
	year = "2015",
	url = "http://www.mmg.mpg.de/publications/working-papers/2015/wp-15-08/"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - EJOUR
TI  - Repertoires of diversity and collective boundaries. Diverging paths between Portugal and Brazil?
T2  - Max Plank Institute WP 15-08
AU  - Oliveira, Nuno
PY  - 2015
SP  - 7-40
SN  - 2192-2357
CY  - Göttingen, Germany
UR  - http://www.mmg.mpg.de/publications/working-papers/2015/wp-15-08/
AB  - The article argues that two divergent paths in the conception of diversity between Europe and Latin America can be traced, with implications at the policy level: Portugal and Brazil are taken as illustrations of these trends. On the one hand, the trend is towards the blurring of ethnic and racial boundaries broadly under the policy concept of “interculturalism”; on the other hand, the Brazilian trend is towards traditional multicultural policies such as the recognition of group specificity according to ethnic boundaries and belonging, with impacts on the distribution of symbolic and material resources. The article sets out the concept of repertoires of diversity as a way of mitigating both the normativity and uniformity of the national model approach. Four differentiated repertoires with implications for collective identity narratives are highlighted. Finally, the main aspects of this comparison are summed up and a number of general conclusions drawn that concur with the idea of distinct pathways in the social organization of collective ethnic and racial belonging.
ER  -