Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Uzelgun, M., Mohamed, D., Lewinski, M. & Castro, P. (2015). Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis. Discourse Studies. 17 (4), 467-484
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. A. Uzelgun et al.,  "Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis", in Discourse Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 467-484 , 2015
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{uzelgun2015_1714985390656,
	author = "Uzelgun, M. and Mohamed, D. and Lewinski, M. and Castro, P.",
	title = "Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis",
	journal = "Discourse Studies",
	year = "2015",
	volume = "17",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.1177/1461445615578965",
	pages = "467-484 ",
	url = "http://dis.sagepub.com/content/17/4/467"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis
T2  - Discourse Studies
VL  - 17
IS  - 4
AU  - Uzelgun, M.
AU  - Mohamed, D.
AU  - Lewinski, M.
AU  - Castro, P.
PY  - 2015
SP  - 467-484 
SN  - 1461-4456
DO  - 10.1177/1461445615578965
UR  - http://dis.sagepub.com/content/17/4/467
AB  - The goal of this study is to examine the argumentative functions of concessive yes, but… constructions. Based on (N?=?22) interview transcripts, we examine the ways environmental activists negotiate their agreements and disagreements over climate change through yes, but… constructions. Starting from conversational analyses of such concessive sequences, we develop an account grounded in argumentative discourse analysis, notably pragma-dialectics. The analysis focuses on how in conceding arguments speakers re-present others’ discourse, what types of criticism they exercise through particular sequential patterns and which argumentative techniques they saliently use. We show in particular that, in disputing the standpoints supported by the complex argumentation they encounter, speakers raise different types of criticism (sufficiency, relevance, acceptability). We discuss how examining not only the sequencing of agreements and disagreements, but also the argumentative relations that generate these, may extend our understanding of such concessive constructions. 
ER  -