Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA)
Sousa, F., Monteiro, I., Walton, A. & Pissarra, J. (2014). Adapting creative problem solving to company requirements: a study on its effectiveness. Creativity and Innovation Management. 23 (2), 111-120
Export Reference (IEEE)
F. Sousa et al.,  "Adapting creative problem solving to company requirements: a study on its effectiveness.", in Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 111-120, 2014
Export BibTeX
@article{sousa2014_1716072091393,
	author = "Sousa, F. and Monteiro, I. and Walton, A. and Pissarra, J.",
	title = "Adapting creative problem solving to company requirements: a study on its effectiveness.",
	journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
	year = "2014",
	volume = "23",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1111/caim.12070",
	pages = "111-120",
	url = "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12070/abstract"
}
Export RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Adapting creative problem solving to company requirements: a study on its effectiveness.
T2  - Creativity and Innovation Management
VL  - 23
IS  - 2
AU  - Sousa, F.
AU  - Monteiro, I.
AU  - Walton, A.
AU  - Pissarra, J.
PY  - 2014
SP  - 111-120
SN  - 0963-1690
DO  - 10.1111/caim.12070
UR  - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12070/abstract
AB  - Owing to company time restrictions and concentration on project development, we began to reduce the duration of creative problem solving (CPS) sessions, and to give more emphasis to the action planning stage. Several changes in our CPS protocol, as well as in its duration, begged the question as to whether these changes were jeopardizing efficacy. To examine this question, six groups of ten university students, working under two different CPS protocols (a five-step method and a four-step method), and three control groups (using no CPS method), were given the same objective and similar conditions. This exploratory experiment compared group performance by change in team commitment, divergent thinking preferences, productivity and the participants' evaluation of the different methods. Results show that the CPS methods were both effective in changing participants' perspectives regarding divergent thinking and team commitment. In the control groups, however, there were no changes as a consequence of the sessions. Results also suggest that the same problem-solving effectiveness can be attained in a shorter time than that traditionally used, and without prior training in CPS. These findings open the door to developing new problem-solving techniques and team work processes, and to more efficient organizational creativity and innovation methodologies.
ER  -