Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Ylönen, A. (2016). Reflections on peacebuilding interventionism: State- and nationbuilding dilemmas in Southern Sudan (2005 to the present). Global Change, Peace and Security. 28 (2), 213-223
A. E. Ylönen, "Reflections on peacebuilding interventionism: State- and nationbuilding dilemmas in Southern Sudan (2005 to the present)", in Global Change, Peace and Security, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 213-223, 2016
@article{ylönen2016_1732191011173, author = "Ylönen, A.", title = "Reflections on peacebuilding interventionism: State- and nationbuilding dilemmas in Southern Sudan (2005 to the present)", journal = "Global Change, Peace and Security", year = "2016", volume = "28", number = "2", doi = "10.1080/14781158.2016.1159548", pages = "213-223", url = "http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14781158.2016.1159548" }
TY - JOUR TI - Reflections on peacebuilding interventionism: State- and nationbuilding dilemmas in Southern Sudan (2005 to the present) T2 - Global Change, Peace and Security VL - 28 IS - 2 AU - Ylönen, A. PY - 2016 SP - 213-223 SN - 1478-1158 DO - 10.1080/14781158.2016.1159548 UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14781158.2016.1159548 AB - In 2005 Southern Sudan emerged from a long period of protracted civil war. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement marked the beginning of a period of post-war peacebuilding concentrating on statebuilding. However, since 2005, the much-needed gradual process of building a unified nation and inclusive national identity has been largely neglected. Instead, there has been emphasis on achieving ‘peace-through-statebuilding’ that has contributed to a highly exclusive social, economic, and political order dictated by the leadership of the dominant rebel movement turned government, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A). This essay reflects on peacebuilding interventionism, and state- and nationbuilding in Southern Sudan since 2005. It argues that this overall process dictated by the SPLM/A leadership, focusing on security and state, excluded the majority of Southern Sudanese from the peace dividend and economic and political opportunities. Further, the exclusive top-down SPLM/A-centric view of the nation marginalized part of the population and contributed to the continuing political instability and armed violence orchestrated by the leading individuals and other military men. ER -