Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Santos, M. H. & Amâncio, L. (2016). Gender inequalities in highly qualified professions: a social psychological analysis. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 4 (1), 427-443
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. H. Santos and L. B. Amâncio,  "Gender inequalities in highly qualified professions: a social psychological analysis", in Journal of Social and Political Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 427-443, 2016
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{santos2016_1714842120372,
	author = "Santos, M. H. and Amâncio, L.",
	title = "Gender inequalities in highly qualified professions: a social psychological analysis",
	journal = "Journal of Social and Political Psychology",
	year = "2016",
	volume = "4",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.5964/jspp.v4i1.487",
	pages = "427-443",
	url = "http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/487"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gender inequalities in highly qualified professions: a social psychological analysis
T2  - Journal of Social and Political Psychology
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
AU  - Santos, M. H.
AU  - Amâncio, L.
PY  - 2016
SP  - 427-443
SN  - 2195-3325
DO  - 10.5964/jspp.v4i1.487
UR  - http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/487
AB  - Research in social and political psychology contributes towards understanding the persistence of job market gender segregation prevailing in recent decades, the consequences for those involved and their reactions when having to cope with gender inequality. Within the framework of the literature on shared ideologies that justify and legitimize discrimination against women, this article focuses on Portugal and analyses the particular case of women in two highly qualified professions traditionally carried out by men – politics and medicine. Drawing on the results of quantitative and qualitative studies, our analytical approach demonstrates how while a majority of participants show awareness of the existence of gender inequality in these markedly masculine professions, meritocratic individualism and personal attributions to discrimination are the recurring explanations rather than any gender-based account. These results allow us to highlight the relevance of gender-based analysis as an ideology and furthermore to argue that ignoring this perspective not only diminishes individual responsibility for social change but also perpetuates gender asymmetries.

ER  -