Ciência-IUL    Publicações    Descrição Detalhada da Publicação    Exportar

Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Horta, H. & Santos, J. M. (2016). An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory. Scientometrics. 108 (3), 1243-1265
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
H. Horta and J. M. Santos,  "An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory", in Scientometrics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1243-1265, 2016
Exportar BibTeX
@article{horta2016_1607116428249,
	author = "Horta, H. and Santos, J. M.",
	title = "An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory",
	journal = "Scientometrics",
	year = "2016",
	volume = "108",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4",
	pages = "1243-1265",
	url = "http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory
T2  - Scientometrics
VL  - 108
IS  - 3
AU  - Horta, H.
AU  - Santos, J. M.
PY  - 2016
SP  - 1243-1265
SN  - 0138-9130
DO  - 10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4
AB  - This study developed the Multi-Dimensional Research Agendas Inventory to measure the key factors associated with the process of research agenda setting. Research agendas reflect the preferences, strategies, influences and goals that guide researchers' decisions to investigate specific topics. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the instrument has eight distinct dimensions: Scientific Ambition, Convergence, Divergence, Discovery, Conservative, Tolerance for Low Funding, Mentor Influence and Collaboration. The model underlying the instrument exhibited a very good fit [X-2/df = 1.710; CFI = 0.961; PCFI = 0.791; RMSEA = 0.035; P(rmsea <= 0.05) < 0.001], and the instrument itself was found to have excellent measuring properties (in terms of validity, reliability and sensitivity). Potential interpretations of the instrument and its implications for research and practice are also discussed in this article.
ER  -