Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Newey, W.K., Ramalho, J.J.S. & Smith, R. J. (2005). Asymptotic bias for GMM and GEL estimators with estimated nuisance parameters. In Andrews, D.W.K.; Stock, J.H. (Ed.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. (pp. 245-281).: Cambridge University Press.
W. Newey et al., "Asymptotic bias for GMM and GEL estimators with estimated nuisance parameters", in Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Andrews, D.W.K.; Stock, J.H., Ed., Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 245-281
@incollection{newey2005_1732207335311, author = "Newey, W.K. and Ramalho, J.J.S. and Smith, R. J.", title = "Asymptotic bias for GMM and GEL estimators with estimated nuisance parameters", booktitle = "Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg", year = "2005", volume = "", series = "", edition = "", pages = "245-245", publisher = "Cambridge University Press", address = "", url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614491.012" }
TY - CHAP TI - Asymptotic bias for GMM and GEL estimators with estimated nuisance parameters T2 - Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg AU - Newey, W.K. AU - Ramalho, J.J.S. AU - Smith, R. J. PY - 2005 SP - 245-281 DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511614491.012 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614491.012 AB - This chapter studies and compares the asymptotic bias of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) estimators in the presence of estimated nuisance parameters. We consider cases in which the nuisance parameter is estimated from independent and identical samples. A simulation experiment is conducted for covariance structure models. Empirical likelihood offers much reduced mean and median bias, root mean squared error and mean absolute error, as compared with two-step GMM and other GEL methods. Both analytical and bootstrap bias-adjusted two-step GMM estimators are compared. Analytical bias-adjustment appears to be a serious competitor to bootstrap methods in terms of finite sample bias, root mean squared error, and mean absolute error. Finite sample variance seems to be little affected. ER -