Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Silva, M. R. & Caetano, A. (2016). Organizational justice across cultures: a systematic review of four decades of research and some directions for the future. Social Justice Research. 29 (3), 257-287
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
M. R. Silva and A. Caetano,  "Organizational justice across cultures: a systematic review of four decades of research and some directions for the future", in Social Justice Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 257-287, 2016
Exportar BibTeX
@article{silva2016_1714706776496,
	author = "Silva, M. R. and Caetano, A.",
	title = "Organizational justice across cultures: a systematic review of four decades of research and some directions for the future",
	journal = "Social Justice Research",
	year = "2016",
	volume = "29",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0",
	pages = "257-287",
	url = "http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Organizational justice across cultures: a systematic review of four decades of research and some directions for the future
T2  - Social Justice Research
VL  - 29
IS  - 3
AU  - Silva, M. R.
AU  - Caetano, A.
PY  - 2016
SP  - 257-287
SN  - 0885-7466
DO  - 10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0
UR  - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0
AB  - This review aims to provide an overview of the main frameworks and findings of cross-cultural organizational justice research and some directions for future research. We systematically reviewed the literature and analysed 74 papers, which include more than one country, from the justice receiver perspective. We contribute to the literature in two ways. First, our analysis of methodological aspects highlights some limitations: most studies compare two countries, mainly China and the USA; cross-cultural equivalence checks are rare; and most studies do not directly measure culture, rather tend to use collectivism and power distance as post hoc explanations of country differences. Second, we offer a broad view of country differences by investigating contextual effects that go beyond national values. Our analysis of the influence of sociocultural influence levels shows that culture, socioeconomic development, organizational, situational, and individual characteristics interact to predict the development of and reactions to (in)justice across countries. A greater integration of levels is important for the advancement of research. Across cultures, more positive justice perceptions are related to positive outcomes, but are achieved differently, so organizations should be aware of sociocultural influences on employees’ perceptions of justice.
ER  -