Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Uzelgun, M. A., Lewinski, M. & Castro, P. (2016). Favorite battlegrounds of climate action: arguing about scientific consensus, representing science-society relations. Science Communication. 38 (6), 699-723
M. A. Uzelgun et al., "Favorite battlegrounds of climate action: arguing about scientific consensus, representing science-society relations", in Science Communication, vol. 38 , no. 6, pp. 699-723, 2016
@article{uzelgun2016_1734919071891, author = "Uzelgun, M. A. and Lewinski, M. and Castro, P.", title = "Favorite battlegrounds of climate action: arguing about scientific consensus, representing science-society relations", journal = "Science Communication", year = "2016", volume = "38 ", number = "6", doi = "10.1177/1075547016676602", pages = "699-723", url = "http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1075547016676602" }
TY - JOUR TI - Favorite battlegrounds of climate action: arguing about scientific consensus, representing science-society relations T2 - Science Communication VL - 38 IS - 6 AU - Uzelgun, M. A. AU - Lewinski, M. AU - Castro, P. PY - 2016 SP - 699-723 SN - 1075-5470 DO - 10.1177/1075547016676602 UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1075547016676602 AB - This article examines how two conflicting views regarding science-society relations—science as the arbiter of truth and as a social endeavor—perpetuate a tension in the way scientific consensus and evidence are called upon in climate change debate. In our analysis of interviews with climate change campaigners, we employ argumentation theory and social representations theory to identify and account for three discursive strategies of responding to climate contrarian arguments: direct confrontation by dichotomous arguments, de-dichotomization by addressing background assumptions, and concession to minor scientific uncertainties. We discuss these strategies emphasizing the science-society relations evident in each. ER -