Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA)
Costa, N., Waldzus, S. & Fiske, A. (2016). Motivation for social relating: relational complementarity increases control, trust, belonging and positive affect. Conference on Motivation and Social Perception.
Export Reference (IEEE)
N. P. Costa et al.,  "Motivation for social relating: relational complementarity increases control, trust, belonging and positive affect", in Conf. on Motivation and Social Perception, 2016
Export BibTeX
@misc{costa2016_1766474098326,
	author = "Costa, N. and Waldzus, S. and Fiske, A.",
	title = "Motivation for social relating: relational complementarity increases control, trust, belonging and positive affect",
	year = "2016",
	howpublished = "Other"
}
Export RIS
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Motivation for social relating: relational complementarity increases control, trust, belonging and positive affect
T2  - Conference on Motivation and Social Perception
AU  - Costa, N.
AU  - Waldzus, S.
AU  - Fiske, A.
PY  - 2016
AB  - We define “social relating” as the pursuit of Relational Complementarity (RelComp): the quality of any interaction pattern that is constituted by actions by each participant that presuppose and complete one another, according to a shared relational model. RelComp is the collective goal-state that individuals must pursue and fulfill in order to produce coherent interactions (e.g. handshakes, business transactions). We hypothesized that psychological rewards resulting from social coordination are fulfilled by RelComp. Specifically, we tested whether RelComp elicits positive affect and fulfills fundamental needs to belong, trust and control. In four experiments, participants read scenarios describing social interactions and rated how they would feel in the character’s shoes. We also manipulated: communal, hierarchical, equalitarian and business interactions; giving vs. receiving benefits; and effort vs. ability attributions. In the four experiments participants in the complementarity condition rated more positive and less negative emotions, and higher sense of belonging, control and trust.
ER  -