Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Entradas, M. (2016). Experimenting with distributed approaches – case study: a ‘national-level’ distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science. 25 (4), 490-498
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. C. Entradas,  "Experimenting with distributed approaches – case study: a ‘national-level’ distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom", in Public Understanding of Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 490-498, 2016
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{entradas2016_1713923679746,
	author = "Entradas, M.",
	title = "Experimenting with distributed approaches – case study: a ‘national-level’ distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom",
	journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
	year = "2016",
	volume = "25",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.1177/0963662514556207",
	pages = "490-498",
	url = "http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0963662514556207"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Experimenting with distributed approaches – case study: a ‘national-level’ distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom
T2  - Public Understanding of Science
VL  - 25
IS  - 4
AU  - Entradas, M.
PY  - 2016
SP  - 490-498
SN  - 0963-6625
DO  - 10.1177/0963662514556207
UR  - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0963662514556207
AB  - An emerging thread in the public participation debate is the need for innovative and more experimental forms of dialogue to address weaknesses of previous structured deliberative methods. This research note discusses an experiment with a distributed approach to dialogue, which used bioenergy as a case study. We discuss the potential of the model to attract a variety of publics and views and to inform policy. This is done with a view to refining future dialogues and increasing the involvement of scientists and other practitioners at the science-policy interface.

ER  -