Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda (2017). The EU data protection reform and the challenges of big data: remaining uncertainties and ways forward. Information and Communications Technology Law. 26 (2), 90-115
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. E. Gonçalves,  "The EU data protection reform and the challenges of big data: remaining uncertainties and ways forward", in Information and Communications Technology Law, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 90-115, 2017
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{gonçalves2017_1715630529914,
	author = "Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda",
	title = "The EU data protection reform and the challenges of big data: remaining uncertainties and ways forward",
	journal = "Information and Communications Technology Law",
	year = "2017",
	volume = "26",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1080/13600834.2017.1295838",
	pages = "90-115",
	url = "http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cict20/current"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The EU data protection reform and the challenges of big data: remaining uncertainties and ways forward
T2  - Information and Communications Technology Law
VL  - 26
IS  - 2
AU  - Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda
PY  - 2017
SP  - 90-115
SN  - 1360-0834
DO  - 10.1080/13600834.2017.1295838
UR  - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cict20/current
AB  - As the first broad reform of the EU data protection legislation is being achieved, and notwithstanding EU institutions’ confident discourse, scepticism remains about the reform’s ability to safeguard the fundamental right to data protection in the face of evolving data processing techniques underlying so-called big data. Yet, one might wonder whether the cause for this difficulty should be ascribed mainly to technological progresses that the law finds it hard to deal with or rather to the policy choices embedded in the legal reform itself. Indeed, a new data protection enforcement model is being adopted, which relies heavily on risk assessment and management by the data controllers themselves. Likewise, data protection authorities see their supervisory role significantly weakened. These developments and the underlying rationality are discussed. Given the limitations of the risk-based approach as currently devised, we suggest that it be reappraised in consideration of risk regulatory experiences in other domains.
ER  -